"Nationalism, Secessionism, and Autonomy"

Date

Thursday March 2, 2023
2:30 pm - 4:00 pm

Location

The Centre for the Study of Democracy and Diversity and the Department of Political Studies Present:

Andr茅 Lecours - University of Ottawa

"Nationalism, Secessionism, and Autonomy"

Thursday, March 2, 2023 | 2:30-4:00 PM

Dunning Hall Room 11, 94 University Avenue, Kingston

Light refreshments will be served!

Abstract: The strength of secessionism in liberal-democracies varies in time and space. Inspired by historical institutionalism, Nationalism, Secessionism, and Autonomy argues that such variation is explained by the extent to which autonomy evolves in time. If autonomy adjusts to the changing identity, interests, and circumstances of an internal national community, nationalism is much less likely to be strongly secessionist than if autonomy is a final, unchangeable settlement. Developing a controlled comparison of, on the one hand, Catalonia and Scotland, where autonomy has been mostly static during key periods of time, and, on the other hand, Flanders and South Tyrol, where it has been dynamic, and also considering the Basque Country, Qu茅bec, and Puerto Rico as additional cases, this book puts forward an elegant theory of secessionism in liberal-democracies: dynamic autonomy staves off secessionism while static autonomy stimulates it.

Biography: Andr茅 Lecours is a professor in the School of Political Studies at the University of Ottawa. His main research interests are Canadian politics, European politics, nationalism (with a focus on Quebec, Scotland, Flanders, Catalonia, and the Basque country) and federalism.  He is the author of Nationalism, Secessionism, and Autonomy (Oxford University Press, 2021), Basque Nationalism and the Spanish State (University of Nevada Press, 2007), and the co-author (with Daniel B茅land) of Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity (Oxford University Press, 2008).  He is the editor of New Institutionalism: Theory and Analysis (University of Toronto Press, 2005).

Political Studies in the News - January 9, 2023

In this Political Science Quarterly article, co-authors Jennie L. Schulze and Ognen Vangelov, with Professor David Haglund trace the remarkable trajectory of post-Communist Hungary over the past three decades, when the onetime 鈥減oster country鈥 for successful liberalization in the erstwhile Soviet bloc managed to turn into the leading champion of illiberalism in the entire European Union (EU). They argue that a combination of internal and exogenous factors vitiated the earlier promise of EU 鈥渃onditionality鈥 to bring about Hungary鈥檚 transition to a stable liberal democracy.

"Quo Vadis Active Learning? Innovative Teaching in the Political Science Classroom"

Date

Thursday January 26, 2023
2:30 pm - 4:00 pm

Location

The Department of Political Studies' Winter 2023 Speaker Series Presents:

Michael Murphy, Banting Postdoctoral Fellow - 成人大片

"Quo Vadis Active Learning?  Innovative Teaching in the Political Science Classroom"

Thursday, January 26, 2023 | 2:30-4:00 PM

Dunning Hall Room 11, 94 University Avenue, Kingston

Light refreshments will be served!

Michael Murphy is a Banting Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Political Studies at 成人大片. 

Abstract:  The scholarship of teaching and learning in politics and international relations (SoTL-P&IR) has grown rapidly in the last quarter-century, with new conferences, journals, and book series opening space for pedagogical conversations that are immediately relevant to the fields. Reviews of this body of research indicates that 鈥渁ctive learning鈥 is one of the foremost topics under consideration, including simulations and games, debates and discussions, in-person and online collaboration, and small-group activities. 鈥淨uo Vadis Active Learning?鈥 presents an analysis of how active learning has grown in political science from League of Nations simulations in Harvard in the 1920s to online collaborations during the COVID-19 pandemic, including results from a systematic review of all SoTL-P&IR articles published from 2000-2019 (forthcoming in International Politics), and shares preliminary findings from a Banting-funded survey on assessment and evaluation in political science education. The presentation further explores emerging topics of interest that will structure disciplinary debates in SoTL-P&IR over the coming years, including experiential learning, equitable and inclusive course design, hybrid or mixed-modality learning, learning spaces, and assessment and evaluation in a post-ChatGPT world.

"Inclusive Redistribution and Perceptions of Immigrants鈥 Membership in Europe and North America"

Date

Friday January 20, 2023
12:00 pm - 1:30 pm

Location

The Canadian Opinion Research Archive (CORA) and the Department of Political Studies' Winter 2023 Speaker Series Present:

Allison Harell, Professor of Political Science at UQAM

"Inclusive Redistribution and Perceptions of Immigrants鈥 Membership

in Europe and North America"

Friday, January 20, 2023 | 12:00-1:30 PM

Mackintosh-Corry Hall, Room D214 | 68 University Avenue, Kingston

Light lunch provided

Abstract: Previous studies of public opinion have shown that immigrants and racialized minorities are often seen as less deserving of welfare benefits than native-born citizens. However, there is no consensus on its causes, or on how to build greater public support for more inclusive redistribution. While prejudice and discourses of deservingness have played a central role in this literature, I will argue that support for redistribution to immigrants and racialized minorities is powerfully tied to perceptions of their 鈥渕embership commitment鈥: that is, whether they are seen as committed to the larger society and willing to make sacrifices for it (Harell et al. 2021). The presentation will focus on results from an original seven-country survey conducted in 2021-2022 in Canada, Denmark, Great Britain, Italy, Sweden, and the US. The study provides the first systematic and cross-national test of the extent to which immigrants suffer a 鈥渕embership penalty鈥 within host societies, and how these membership penalties vary across Western countries with different citizenship and welfare regimes. In turn, these penalties are powerfully linked to both general redistribution attitudes, but especially inclusive redistribution, understood as the inclusion of immigrants in major social programs on the same terms and conditions as native-born. I conclude with a broader discussion of the barriers that immigrants and other marginalized groups face in being perceived as equally committed as native-born citizens and how these barriers might be addressed.