Maximizing the impact of research data

Maximizing the impact of research data

By Communications staff

May 26, 2016

Share

Emily Murphy, a PhD candidate in the Department of English Language and Literature, was one of the speakers at the third annual Data Day at Queen鈥檚. One of the ways she interacts with data is in her teaching at the Field School in Digital Humanities at the Bader International Study Centre (BISC). (Supplied photo)

In the modern classroom data comes in many forms and some of them are not the most apparent, such as in the humanities. Data Day brings researchers across the disciplines together to share their unique experiences with data, including those that might be less obvious. 

Emily Murphy, a PhD candidate in the Department of English Language and Literature and one of the speakers at the third annual at Queen鈥檚, interacts with data through her own research and in her teaching at the Field School in Digital Humanities at the Bader International Study Centre (BISC).

Students in Murphy鈥檚 classroom this year experienced humanities鈥 relationship to data first hand, as they learned and applied a mark-up language called Text Encoding Initiative-conformant XML (TEI). They marked up the letters of 18th century musician and writer, Amelia Alderson Opie, from a privately-held collection belonging to English professors Shelley King and John B. Pierce. This enabled students to engage with the practice of digitizing text and to develop a critical perspective on the technology.

鈥淲e examined what teaching in a humanities setting means, and how we need to adapt humanities teaching, within the context of digital humanities,鈥 Murphy explained during her session. 鈥淎s we are teaching data, technology and contemporary culture, we are pushed to collaboration, less hierarchy.

鈥淭he humanities approaches to data are going to look different from other approaches, such as sciences and social sciences. This is because those who study it are choosing it. Data is not something with a lot of history in humanities, as we have historically thought of our subject matter as text rather than data. We are still hammering out the relationship that data has to the humanities and to the broader cultural context.鈥

Many other Queen鈥檚 researchers across the disciplines also have data on their minds. This was demonstrated by the number of researchers and scholars in Speaker鈥檚 Corner at Stauffer Library on Tuesday, May 10, for Data Day, hosted by , , and the . This free event provided participants with an opportunity to meet researchers and data service providers, and featured local services and national initiatives for managing, linking and promoting research data. 

鈥淚t was wonderful to see so many researchers, all with a different perspective and focus, who are thinking about ways that they can maximize the impact of their data,鈥 says moderator Francine Berish, Geospatial Data Librarian, Queen鈥檚 University Library.

Opening comments at Data Day were provided by Steven Liss, Vice-Principal (Research), who was the co-founder and co-chair of the Leadership Council for Digital Infrastructure. This was followed by the Keynote Address, Queen's in the Global Knowledge Commons, given by Martha Whitehead, Vice-Provost and University Librarian at Queen鈥檚 University, and president of Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CARL). Whitehead explored the open science context of research data management, and examined the concept of scholarly communications. She also shared some of the Institutional Research Data Management services at Queen鈥檚, as well as network opportunities that have been led by CARL, and are available to researchers across Canada.

Another series of talks, Joining the Dots: Linking Data, Publications and Creators in the Research Life Cycle, featured Laural Haak, Executive Director of Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID), who visited Queen鈥檚 from Washington to speak about Research Information Management with Persistent Identifiers, and how ORCID provides identifiers that distinguish researchers from each other. 

Additional topics ranged from evolving Queen's data services, national guidelines (such as Tri-Council), and national and international initiatives for managing, linking and promoting research data. Queen鈥檚 researchers also shared their experiences in data management and experiences with digital scholarship across disciplines.

Looking to the future of data, Murphy says that 鈥淢any hands make light work.鈥 While a lot of the groundwork of creating a digital humanities community has been seeded by her and other researchers at Queen鈥檚, there is a lot of interest, and other researchers who could benefit from what they are building. There is also always room for more advocacy and voices, for example, the voices of graduate students, as Murphy points out, 鈥淧art of my work as president of the graduate caucus of Digital Scholarship Ontario has been to ensure that the needs of grad researchers in the humanities are represented as well as those of, for example, social-science researchers.鈥

鈥淥n Data Day, participants were engaged, and asked a lot of great questions, and this event initiated conversations that are still taking place, days and weeks after the event,鈥 says Berish. 鈥淲e can鈥檛 wait to start planning for next year.鈥

Attendees are invited to complete the . Input will be used to plan next year鈥檚 event.

成人大片 Library offers a Research Data Management Service that includes assistance developing data management plans, documenting and storing data, and finding appropriate archives. Please contact for help with any of your data needs.