Calculating the real value of clinical trials
At the beginning of her career as a hematologist in the United Kingdom, Annette Hay was constantly reminded of the high priority assigned to clinical trial work within the national health care system. 鈥淎s a trainee in the UK, every week we had to present the files of new patients that we鈥檇 recently seen to the multidisciplinary team,鈥 she recalls. 鈥淚f there was ever a clinical trial opportunity that you should have offered the patient but didn鈥檛, you were in trouble.鈥
She has brought this perspective with her to the Queen鈥檚 Cancer Research Institute, where she joined the Cancer Clinical Trials Division as a senior investigator in 2014. Here she is dedicated to demonstrating the virtues of conducting this work to help patients directly and to advance the cause of medical research.
鈥淲hile there are up-front costs to conducting a clinical trial,鈥 she acknowledges, 鈥渢here may well be benefits and savings.鈥
By way of example, she points to the fact that many patients obtain drugs and pathology testing through their participation in a trial rather than through the public health care system. In a formal study of Canadian clinical trials from 1999 to 2011, she and her colleagues estimated the resulting reduction in fees, predominantly to the health care system, at more than $32 million.
鈥淭his is cost-saving for the government,鈥 she argues.
In addition, Hay suggests that a great deal of information collected through a clinical trial might already have been filed in administrative databases elsewhere.
She points to Ontario鈥檚 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), a not-for-profit organization that assembled this kind of data for research purposes. The contents of the ICES database could mirror the personal details that doctors and other staff take from trial participants, which can be among the most time consuming and expensive parts of the clinical trial process.
It's the culture and the ethos that patients should be given the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, where they can access emerging treatments and contribute to advances for future generations.
According to Hay, much of this work could be eliminated by matching trial patient records to those already filed with ICES. When she explored the possibility of using identifying details such as year of birth to correlate these records, she discovered that it was possible to combine the two in about 90% of cases. And, she maintains, that rate could be further improved if even more identifiers can be employed.
Such research represents much more than an academic exercise in cost-accounting and streamlining bureaucratic procedures. Hay meets every week with patients at the cancer centre 鈥 encounters that put a very human face on her efforts. Even technicians who handle lab work behind the scenes, she says, will closely follow the progress of patients they have never met.
鈥淚t keeps the research real,鈥 she concludes. 鈥淭here鈥檚 a rationale for what you鈥檙e doing.鈥
鈥淚t's the culture and the ethos that patients should be given the opportunity to participate in clinical trials, where they can access emerging treatments and contribute to advances for future generations.鈥
听
听
Sinclair Cancer Research Institute
The Sinclair Cancer Research Institute (SCRI) is driving global efforts to combat cancer through cutting-edge research, innovative facilities, clinical trials, and a program to train the next generation of cancer researchers.
Discovery: They explore new drugs and therapies, using basic science and advanced imaging to understand the body鈥檚 response to treatments.
Trials: Potential treatments are rigorously tested to establish new standards of care for specific cancers.